MODERN CONDITIONOF PROBLEM OF TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ONGOING INTRAPELVIC BLEEDING AFTER UNSTABLE PELVIC RING INJURIES

Egiazaryan K.A, Starchik D.A., Gordienko D.I., Lysko A.M.  

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia,
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, Saint Petersburg, Russia

MODERN CONDITIONOF PROBLEM OF TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ONGOING INTRAPELVIC BLEEDING AFTER UNSTABLE PELVIC RING INJURIES 

The problem of treatment of intrapelvic bleedings after unstable pelvic ring injuries is still actual and is mainly characterized by quite high incidence of lethal outcomes and significant medical and social consequences. According to various authors, retroperitoneal hematomas complicate up to 44 % of all closed abdominal and pelvic injuries [1, 2]. Ishikawa [3] in his study of causes of retroperitoneal hematomas concluded that the main cause of retroperitoneal haemorrhage was traumatic damage of the pelvic ring in more than half of cases. It is necessary to note that injuries to pelvic bones present 2-8 % of all injuries to axial skeleton, but they are a part of associated or multiple injuries in more than 22 % [4-7]. 30-60 % of such injuries are lethal, with almost each third case as a consequence of uncontrolled bleeding [8-12].
In 8 of 10 cases, the main causes of massive bleeding into small pelvis cavity are spongy pattern of pelvic bones, unconnected vessels in bone matter in fracture site, common injury to sacral venous plexus, and coagulopathy in patients with acute associated injury. Moreover, blood loss can achieve 3.5-6 l [13, 14].
Considering the importance of the reviewed problem, the search for the universal and efficient technique for arresting intrapelvic bleeding has been continuing for years. However at the present time, each developed and clinically tested methods has its own limitations for use and the range of complications influencing on the final result.

External fixation of pelvic ring

According to the modern recommendations, the presence of mechanical instability of the pelvic ring, regardless of hemodynamics condition, is the indication for urgent fixation, which has to be realized as early as possible after hospital admission [15-17].
The simplest technique of primary stabilization of the pelvic ring is pelvic bandage or manual constriction of pelvic bones with the sheet. According to actual recommendations from ATLS [18], it is obligatory to use the pelvic bandage if the patient has some clinical signs of any injury to the pelvic ring. Biomechanical studies of postmortem materials showed the efficiency of use of the pelvic bandage in decreasing intrapelvic volume and control of hemorrhage [19-21]. However the use of the pelvic bandage is associated with the risk of development of necrosis and skin erosion. The main cause was its long term use – more than 24-48 hours from the moment of application. It is recommended to prevent such problems with use of external fixation tools.
The specific methods of stabilization have been developed on the basis of distribution of the pelvic ring into anterior and posterior semi-rings [22]. Two main method of external fixation apparatus have been developed and are used for the anterior semi-ring: the first – with introduction of Shants’s screws into iliac wings, the second – in supraacetabular manner. The first way is considered as more simple and quick, but small bony corridor is the cause of enough weak fixation of pins, and this cause is associated with high amount of secondary displacements and disorders of fixation, and with high probability of penetration of corticals and soft tissue injuries. A compared to this, the second method allow fixation of Shants’s screws in wider bone tunnel with high amount of strong bone tissue. The main disadvantage of this method is its complexity, which is determined by need for X-ray devices. This requirement is determined by higher risk in conduction of pins. So, the main complications of the second method are penetration of the ipsilateral hip joint or penetration into greater ischiadic with risk of an injury to the sciatic nerve and vascular nervous bundles [9, 23].
However fixation with the above mentioned techniques for injuries to posterior parts of the pelvic ring is unstable. For such cases, C-frame, which was created by Ganz in 1991, is recommended [24]. C-frame allows fast stabilization of hemodynamic values [25, 26]. During fixation of posterior parts of the pelvic ring with C-frame, it is recommended to control the reposition and correct position of the frame by means of X-ray techniques. Otherwise, the complications are possible such as migration of the fixator into the greater ischiadic, with possibility of an injury to the sciatic nerve, gluteal vascular nervous bundles, intestine puncture, perforation of pelvic walls, insufficient compression of posterior parts, infectious contamination in region of upcoming complete fixation of posterior parts of the pelvic ring [27, 28]. Kim [29] described a clinical case of pseudoaneurysm of superior gluteal artery after fixation of posterior parts of the pelvic ring with C-frame in blind manner.
At the present time, a new technique for low-invasive external fixation of the pelvic ring has been becoming popular. It was described by Knutter in 2009 [30] and was named later as internal fixation (INFIX) [31]. The best clinical results of its use were noted in patients with excessive development of subcutaneous fat and in older patients [32-34]. The essence of the method consists in introduction of pedicular screws into the supraacetabular region with subsequent subcutaneous connection with the premodelled spinal bar. As compared to the common external fixation of the anterior semi-ring, this technique decreases the risk of infectious complications, results in early activation of patients, a possibility for supine position during surgical interventions for the spine, and a great comfort as a technique for final stabilization of the pelvic ring. However the first results of use of the new technique of fixation indicate some complications such as a possibility for compression of external iliac vessels, femoral skin nerve paresis, femoral nerve paresis, deep infection, loosening of fixators, and residual chronic pain [35, 36].
Therefore, external fixation is the obligatory component of anti-hock therapy in patients with ongoing intrapelvic bleeding as result of unstable injuries to the pelvic ring [37-40].

Actual methods of intrapelvic bleeding arrest

For cases of unstable hemodynamics after external fixation and closure of the pelvic ring, it is necessary to conduct the pelvic tamponade or vascular angioembolization [41, 42]. The analysis of international literature showed that American and European surgical schools have different opinions on an efficient method for intrapelvic bleeding arrest: angioembolization is more popular in USA, pelvic tamponade – in European countries [10, 43, 44].
Transcatheter angioembolization, which was firstly performed by Margolies in 1972 [45], was accepted by the world society as the efficient neurosurgical method for intrapelvic bleeding arrest. Angioembolization can be selective and non-selective. Selective angioembolization is more preferable due to lower amount of complications. However it is associated with higher risk of failure of bleeding arrest as compared to non-selective angioembolization [46]. The complications of this technique include the necrosis of gluteal muscle, urine bladder, urinary tract walls and the skin, development of deep infection, nerve injuries and contrast-induced nephropathy [47, 48]. However predominant development of bleeding from veins and pelvic ring fracture sites determine the efficiency of angiography as the primary method for bleeding arrest only in 10-20 % of cases [2, 37]. This fact was the cause of creation of the new technique for intrapelvic bleeding arrest.
A technique for retroperitoneal bleeding arrest, developed by T. Pohlemann et al. in Hannover [49], showed a reliable decrease in mortality in patients with unstable injuries to the pelvic ring and intrapelvic bleeding. Experienced persons can perform this procedure within 20 minutes with minimal blood loss [50]. Realization of a separate approach was more protected in relation to cross contamination from intraabdominal injuries to retroperitoneal space, resulting in reliable decrease in risk of infectious complications [51]. Drapes stay in the wound within 24-48 hours. Then they are changed or removed [52]. Pelvic tamponade is more invasive method in relation to angiography. It increases the risk of infectious complications (up to 15 %) and causes need for surgery, additional blood loss and problems relating to middle laparotomy. The need for recurrent tamponade increased the risk of infectious complications [26].
Some studies [11, 53] of comparison of both methods for intrapelvic bleeding arrest showed that time of carrying out and availability in groups of patients with pelvic tamponade was lower in comparison with angioembolization. Another important factor is the fact that realization of angioembolization requires for availability of special surgery room, equipment and trained team which are not available in each hospital. However it does not mean that realization of pelvic tamponade precludes the realization of angioembolization. Conversely, it is recommended to perform it for control of arterial source of bleeding in case of ongoing bleeding after pelvic tamponade [54, 55]. According to some authors [28, 56], the amount of patients who needed for angioembolization after pelvic tamponade was 13-20 %.

New trends in international practice of intrapelvic bleeding arrest

Recently, one can observe the increasing trend of return to the method of temporary occlusion of the aorta. According to some authors, this method gives the critical time for search of bleeding source and for its arrest.
This method was firstly mentioned in 1954 when Hudhes C.W. [57] used it as a way of first aid for soldiers in Korean war. However the high traumatic potential of this method caused some evident limitations of its use. After decades, it resulted in development of less invasive but similar technique for bleeding arrest – resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) [58-60].
Subsequent experimental animal studies [61] and 10-20 year experimental studies [62] showed the efficiency of this technique. However it has its own disadvantages. Some authors [59, 60, 63] described some cases of elevation or development of intracranial and intrapleural bleeding above the level of aortal occlusion, ruptures and dissection of the aorta, and possible risk of multiple organ failure after balloon purging after reperfusion injuries.
The world-wide trend to search for less invasive solutions for realization of medical interventions also resulted in development of this direction in intrapelvic bleeding arrest. In 2015, S. Huang [64] offered to perform the tamponade of mall pelvis by means of urinary bladder catheterization with its filling with 500-600 ml of saline. The main criterion, which is necessary for realization in clinical practice, was confirmation of integrity of urinary tract. The given clinical case showed the achievement of hemodynamics in early period after admission to the intensive care unit and tamponade with filled urinary bladder. However some time after removal of fluid, the patient’s hemodynamics destabilized. Therefore, the surgeons needed to perform laparotomy for correction of ongoing bleeding.
In December 2016, the group of researchers headed by K.K. Sokol [65] published the experimental animal study. The essence of the study consisted in testing and comparison of the new technique of low invasive balloon tamponade in comparison with the group of animals without tamponade and with the group receiving the pelvic tamponade according to the standard technique. The scientists proved the efficiency of low invasive balloon tamponade, with balloons placed into the Retzius's cavity in pigs, resulting in successful effect of pelvic tamponade. The method was quite simple and fast, with controlled purging and injection of fluid for simplification of angiography.
Therefore, the new low invasive techniques present the quite perspective direction of surgical treatment of patients with unstable injury to the pelvic ring complicated by intrapelvic bleeding from the point of extension of indications and decrease in amount of complications. However the precise techniques of such operations have not been studied yet and they require for development of individual indications for its realization, technique and clinical administration in practice. 

DISCUSSION

Generally, the conducted analysis of the modern literature of the problem of intrapelvic bleeding arrest after unstable injuries to the pelvic ring showed the absence of the current uniform opinion on selection of the optimal technique for treatment of the studied injury despite of high amount of modern methods which decrease the risk of complications.
It is known that external fixation of the pelvic ring, despite of all advantages of mechanical stabilization at the urgent stage of first aid, is not always an efficient method for restoration of hemodynamic values that requires additional actions of the surgical team. Currently, such techniques are endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, angioembolization and pelvic tamponade. REBOA is currently considered as the intermediate stage in arrangement of care for fast and efficient arrest of bleeding, but ischemic and reperfusion complications causes the serious limitations of the temporary interval of use of this technique. Owing to predominance of venous bleeding over arterial one, angioembolization has more limited indications for use in relation to pelvic tamponade, despite of low invasiveness, and difficulties in realization of selective technique cause the development of ischemic injuries to internal organs and surrounding soft tissues which can be the source of septic inflammation in future. Pelvic tamponade is quite invasive technique for bleeding arrest that influences on the incidence of infectious complications and on need for recurrent surgical interventions.
Considering the world-wide trend to low invasiveness and low traumatic potential of surgical interventions and need for fast rehabilitation, we can state that closed low-invasive pelvic tamponade is one of the most perspective techniques for intrapelvic bleeding arrest. However despite of the first encouraging experimental results, there are a lot of unsolved issues relating to technique of such surgical interventions. 

CONCLUSION

Summing the results, we should note that the problem of selection of a technique for intrapelvic bleeding arrest in patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries is still actual. The first research works of low invasive methods of urgent pelvic surgery (REBOA, cystic and low invasive balloon cystic pelvic tamponade) demonstrate the perspective possibilities in view of efficiency and safety at the background of quite small approaches. However the final opinion on positive aspects of the above mentioned techniques requires for special topographic and anatomical examination of details of surgical techniques and targeted estimation of distances from implanted devices to magistral vessels, nerves and internal organs of small pelvis. Moreover, successful clinical implementation of the discussed techniques requires for realization of an experimental animal study. Without evidences, the wide clinical use of low invasive techniques for profile patients is impossible. 

Information on financing and conflict of interests

The study was conducted without sponsorship.

The authors declare the absence of any clear and potential conflicts of interests relating to publication of this article.

REFERENCES:

1.      Smolyar AN. Diagnostic and treatment of traumatic retroperitoneal hemorrhages. Abstracts of PhD in med. M., 2012. 272 p. Russian (Смоляр А.Н. Диагностика и лечение травматических забрюшинных кровоизлияний: дисс. … д-ра мед. наук. М., 2012. 272 с.)
2.      Juern JS, Milia D, Codner P, Beckman M, Somberg L, Webb T, et al. Clinical significance of computed tomography contrast extravasation in blunt trauma patients with a pelvic fracture. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82(1): 138-140
3.      Ishikawa K, Tohira T, Mizushima Y, Matsuoka T, Mizobata Y, Yokota J. Traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma spreads through the interfascial planes. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2005; 59(3): 595-608
4.      Goncharov AV, Samokhvalov IM, Suvorov VV, Markevich VYu, Pichugin AA, Petrov AN. Problems of staged treatment of patients with severe cocncomitant injuries in a regional traumosystem. Polytrauma. 2017; (4): 6-15. Russian (Гончаров А.В., Самохвалов И.М., Суворов В.В., Маркевич В.Ю., Пичугин А.А., Петров А.Н. Проблемы этапного лечения пострадавших с тяжелыми сочетанными травмами в условиях региональной травмосистемы //Политравма. 2017. № 4. С. 6-15)
5.      Burkhardt M, Kristen A, Culemann U, Koehler D, Histing T, Holstein JH, et al. Trauma Register DGU pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: are we still up-to-date with massive fluid resuscitation? Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2014. 45(3): 70-75
6.      Esmer E, Derst P, Schulz M, Siekmann H, Delank KS. Einfluss der externen Beckenstabilisierung bei hamodynamisch instabilen Beckenfrakturen. Unfallchirurg. 2015; Springer Verlag Online Publication. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00113-015-0119-3
7.      Wohlrath B, Trentzsch H, Hoffmann R, Kremer M, Schmidt-Horlohè K, Schweigkofler U. Preclinical and clinical treatment of instable pelvic injuries: Results of an online survey. Unfallchirurg. 2016; 119(9): 755-762
8.      Holcomb JB, del Junco DJ, Fox EE, Wade CE, Cohen MJ, Schreiber MA, et al. The prospective, observational, multicenter, major trauma transfusion (PROMMTT) study: comparative effectiveness of a time-varying treatment with competing risks. JAMA surgery. 2013; 148(2): 127-136
9.      Guerado E, Bertrand ML, Valdes L, Cruz E, Cano JR. Resuscitation of polytrauma patients: the management of massive skeletal bleeding. Open Orthop. J. 2015; 31(9): 283-295
10.    Costantini TW, Coimbra R, Holcomb JB, Podbielski JM, Catalano R, Blackburn A, et al. Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2016; 80(5): 717-725
11.    Burlew CC, Moore EE, Stahel PF, Geddes AE, Wagenaar AE, Pieracci FM, et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing reduces mortality in patients with life-threatening hemorrhage due to unstable pelvic fractures. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017; 82(2): 233-242
12.    Tesoriero RB, Bruns BR, Narayan M, Dubose J, Guliani SS, Brenner ML, et al. Angiographic embolization for hemorrhage following pelvic fracture: Is it «time» for a paradigm shift? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017; 82(1): 18-26
13.    Pape HC, Sanders R, Borrelli JJ. The poly-traumatized patient with fractures. A multi-disciplinary approach. Second edition. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2016. 437 p.
14.    Monchal T, Hornez E, Coisy M, Bourgouin S, de Roulhac J, Balandraud P. Preperitoneal pelvic packing. Journal of Visceral Surgery. 2017; Suppl. 1: S57-S60
15.    Skoroglyadov AV, Moldakumov ZhM, Korobushkin GV, Lidyaev AA, Rat'ev AP. Treatment algorithm for patients with combined pelvic trauma: key stages of care. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2015; (5): 40-45. Russian (Скороглядов А.В., Молдакумов Ж.М., Коробушкин Г.В., Лидяев А.А., Ратьев А.П. Алгоритм лечения пострадавших с сочетанной травмой таза: ключевые этапы оказания помощи //Московский хирургический журнал. 2015. № 5. С. 40-45)
16.    Shapkin YuG, Seliverstov PA. Treatment tactics of unstable pelvic injuries in polytrauma. News of Surgery. 2015; 23(4): 452-459. Russian (Шапкин Ю.Г., Селиверстов П.А. Тактика лечения нестабильных повреждений таза при политравме //Новости хирургии. 2015. Т. 23, №. 4. С. 452-459)
17.    Sharpe JP, Magnotti LJ, Gobbell WC, Huang X, Perez EA, Fabian TC, et al. Impact of early operative pelvic fixation on long-term self-reported outcome following severe pelvic fracture. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 82(3): 444-450
18.    American college of surgeons committee on trauma: advanced trauma life support for doctors. 9th edition /American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Chicago, 2012. 366 p.
19.    Köhler D, Sellei RM, Sop A, Tarkin, IS, Pfeifer R, Garrison RL, et al. Effects of pelvic volume changes on retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal pressure in the injured pelvic ring: a cadaveric model. J. Trauma. 2011; 71(3): 585-590
20.    Prasarn ML, Horodyski MB, Schneider PS, Pernik MN, Gary GL, Rechtinec GR. Comparison of skin pressure measurements with the use of pelvic circumferential compression devices on pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2016; 47(3): 717-720
21.    Tran TL, Brasel KJ, Karmy-Jones R, Rowell S, Schreiber MA, Shatz DV, et al. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: management of pelvic fracture with hemodynamic instability-2016 updates. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 81(6): 1171-1174
22.    Tile M, Helfet DL, Kellam JF, Vrahas M. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. Principles and methods of management. Fourth edition. Georg Thieme Verlag, 2015. 1044 p.
23.    Stahel PF, Mauffrey C, Smith WR, McKean J, Hao J, Burlew CC, et al. External fixation for acute pelvic ring injuries: decision making and technical options. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 75(5): 882-887
24.    Ganz R, Krushell RJ, Jakob RP, Küffer J. The antishock pelvic clamp. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1991; (267): 71-78
25.    Litvina EA. Emergency stabilization of pelvic bone fractures in patients with polytrauma. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2014; (1): 19-26. Russian (Литвина Е.А. Экстренная стабилизация переломов костей таза у больных с политравмой //Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.И. Приорова. 2014. № 1. C. 19-26)
26.    Rudloff MI, Triantafillou KM. Management of pelvic ring injuries in unstable patients. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2016; 47(3): 551-563
27.    Wollgarten M, Keel MJ, Pape HC. Emergency fixation of the pelvic ring using the pelvic C clamp – has anything changed? Injury. 2015; 46(3): 1-2
28.    Coccolini F, Montori G, Catena F, Kluger Y, Biffl W, Moore EE, et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2017; 12(5): 1-18
29.    Kim WY, Lee SW, Kim KS, Lee JY. Superior gluteal artery pseudoaneurysm caused by pelvic C-clamp blind application: a case report. Hip Pelvis. 2017; 29(2): 145-149
30.    Kuttner M, Klaiber A, Lorenz T, Füchtmeier B, Neugebauer R. The pelvic subcutaneous cross-over internal fixator. Unfallchirurg. 2009; 112(7): 661-669
31.    Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2012; 26(1): 1-8
32.    Mcdonald E, Theologis AA, Horst P, Kandemir U, Pekmezci M. When do anterior external or internal fixators provide additional stability in an unstable (Tile C) pelvic fracture? A biomechanical study. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2014. Springer Verlag Online Publication. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00068-014-0482-8/
33.    Bi C, Wang Q, Wu J, Zhou F, Zhang F, Liang H, et al. Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation versus anterior pelvic external fixation for the management of anterior pelvic ring fractures: a comparative study. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2017; 12(1): 185
34.    Shetty AP, Bosco A, Perumal R, Dheenadhayalan J, Rajasekaran S. Midterm radiologic and functional outcomes of minimally-invasive fixation of unstable pelvic fractures using anterior internal fixator (INFIX) and percutaneous iliosacral screws. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma. 2017; 8(3): 241-248
35.    Fang, C, Alabdulrahman H, Pape HC. Complications after percutaneous internal fixator for anterior pelvic ring injuries. Int. Orthop. 2017; 41(9): 1785-1790
36.    Jain M, Nanda SM, Mohapatra SS, Samal BP. Bladder incarceration following anterior pelvic infix of a traumatic pubic symphysis diastasis treated with immediate open reduction and internal fixation. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma. 2017; 8(1): 11-16
37.    Samokhvalov I.M., Borisov M.B., Kazhanov I.V., Reva V.A. Emergency medical care in a hospital, features of the first stage of tactics of a multi-stage surgical treatment (damage control) for unstable pelvic fractures. Emergency Medical Care. 2016; 17(3): 39-45. Russian (Самохвалов И.М., Борисов М.Б., Кажанов И.В., Рева В.А. Скорая медицинская помощь в стационаре, особенности первого этапа тактики многоэтапного хирургического лечения (damage control) при нестабильных переломах таза //Скорая медицинская помощь. 2016. Т. 17, № 3. С. 39-45)
38.    Black SR, Sathy A.K., Jo C, Wiley MR, Minei JP, Starr AJ. Improved survival after pelvic fracture: 13-year experience at a single trauma center using a multidisciplinary institutional protocol. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2016; 30(1): 22-28
39.    Buller LT, Best MJ, Quinnan SM A nationwide analysis of pelvic ring fractures: incidence and trends in treatment, length of stay, and mortality. Geriatr. Orthop. Surg. Rehabil. 2016; 7(1): 9-17
40.    Jang JY, Shim H, Kwon HY, Chung H, Jung PY, Kim S, et al. Improvement of outcomes in patients with pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability after the establishment of a Korean regional trauma center. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2017; Springer Verlag Online Publication. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00068-017-0886-3
41.    Fayn A.M. Diagnostic and treatment of severe pelvic fractures by patients with concomitant and multiple injuries. Abstracts of PhD in medicine. M., 2017. 238 p. Russian (Файн А.М. Диагностика и лечение тяжелых переломов костей таза у пострадавших с сочетанной и множественной травмой: дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М., 2017. 238 с.)
42.    Guerado E, Medina A, Mata MI, Galvan JM, Bertrand ML. Protocols for massive blood transfusion: when and why, and potential complications. Eur. J Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2016; 42(3): 283-295
43.    Hsu JM, Yadev S, Faraj S. Controlling hemorrhage in exsanguinating pelvic fractures: Utility of extraperitoneal pelvic packing as a damage control procedure. Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj. Sci. 2016; 6(3): 148-152
44.    Moskowitz EE, Burlew CC, Moore EE, Pieracci FM, Fox CJ, Campion EM, et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing is effective for hemorrhage control in open pelvic fractures. The American Journal of Surgery. 2017. Available at: http://www.americanjournalofsurgery.com/article/S0002-9610(17)30772-9/fulltext
45.    Margolies MN, Ring EJ, Waltman AC, Kerr WSJr, Baum S. Arteriography in the management of hemorrhage from pelvic fractures. N. Engl. J. Med. 1972; 287(7): 317-321
46.    Ramasamy B, Thewlis D, Moss MJ, Fraysse F, Rickman M, Solomon LB. Complications of transarterial embolization during the resuscitation of pelvic fractures. Injury. 2017; 48(12): 2724-2729
47.    Matityahu A, Marmor M, Elson JK, Lieber C, Rogalski G, Lin C, et al. Acute complications of patients with pelvic fractures after pelvic angiographic embolization. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2013; 471(9): 2906-2911
48.    Salcedo ES, Brown IE, Corwin MT, Galante JM. Pelvic angioembolization in trauma–indications and outcomes. International Journal of Surgery. 2016; 33(Pt B): 231-236
49.    Pohlemann T, Gansslen A, Bosch U, Tscherne H. The technique of packing for control of hemorrhage in complex pelvic fractures. Techniques in Orthopaedics. 1994; 9(4): 267-270
50.    Giannoudis PV, Pape HC. Damage control orthopaedics in unstable pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2004; 35(7): 671-677
51.    Burlew CC, Moore EE, Smith WR, Johnson JL, Biffl WL, Barnett CC, et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing/external fixation with secondary angioembolization: optimal care for life-threatening hemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2011; 212(4): 628-635
52.    Tai DK, Li WH, Lee KY, Cheng M, Lee KB, Tang LF, et al. Retroperitoneal pelvic packing in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a level I trauma center experience. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery.2011; 71(4): 79-86
53.    Agri F, Bourgeat M, Becce F, Moerenhout K, Pasquier M, Borens O, et al. Association of pelvic fracture patterns, pelvic binder use and arterial angio-embolization with transfusion requirements and mortality rates; a 7-year retrospective cohort study. BMC Surgery. 2017; 17(1): 104
54.    Kazhanov IV, Manukovskiy VA, Mikityuk SI, Kolchanov EA. Extraperitoneal pelvic tamponade as a method of surgical hemostasis for unstable pelvic ring injuries. Medico-biological and Socio-Psychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations. 2017; (3): 65-77. Russian (Кажанов И.В., Мануковский В.А., Микитюк С.И., Колчанов Е.А. Внебрюшинная тампонада таза как способ хирургического гемостаза при нестабильных повреждениях тазового кольца //Медико-биологические и социально-психологические проблемы безопасности в чрезвычайных ситуациях. 2017. №. 3. С. 65-77)
55.    Lustenberger T, Wutzler S, Störmann P, Laurer H, Marzi I. The role of angio-embolization in the acute treatment concept of severe pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2015; 46(Suppl 4): 33-38
56.    Li Q, Dong J, Yang Y, Wang G, Wang Y, Liu P, et al. Retroperitoneal packing or angioembolization for haemorrhage control of pelvic fractures – quasi-randomized clinical trial of 56 haemodynamically unstable patients with Injury Severity Score ≥33. Injury. 2016; 47(2): 395-401
57.    Hughes CW. Use of an intra-aortic balloon catheter tamponade for controlling intra-abdominal hemorrhage in man. Surgery. 1954; 36(1): 65-68
58.    Saito N, Matsumoto H, Yagi T, Hara Y, Hayashida K, Motomura T, et al. Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2015; 78(5): 897-904
59.    DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, Brenner M, Skiada D, Inaba K, Cannon J, et al. The AAST prospective aortic occlusion for resuscitation in trauma and acute care surgery (AORTA) registry: data on contemporary utilization and outcomes of aortic occlusion and resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 81(3): 409-419
60.    Davidson, AJ, Russo RM, Reva VA, Brenner ML, Moore LJ, Ball C, et al. The pitfalls of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: Risk factors and mitigation strategies. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018; 84(1): 192-202
61.    Morrison JJ, Percival TJ, Markov NP, Villamaria C, Scott DJ, Saches KA, et al. Aortic balloon occlusion is effective in controlling pelvic hemorrhage. J. Surg. Res. 2012; 177(2): 341-347
62.    Pieper A, Thony F, Brun J, Rodière M, Boussat B, Arvieux C, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for pelvic blunt trauma and life-threatening hemorrhage: a 20-year experience in a level-I trauma center. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018; 84(3): 449-454
63.    Uchino H, Tamura N, Echigoya R, Ikegami T, Fukuoka T. «REBOA» – is it really safe? A case with massive intracranial hemorrhage possibly due to endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). The American journal of case reports. 2016; 17: 810-813
64.    Huang S, Vohora A, Russ MK, Mathew JK, Johnny CS, Stevens J, et al. Delaying urinary catheter insertion in the reception and resuscitation of blunt multitrauma and using a full bladder to tamponade pelvic bleeding. Injury. 2015; 46(6): 1081-1083
65.    Sokol KK, Black GE, Willey SB, Song MY, Marko ST, Eckert MJ, et al. Preperitoneal balloon tamponade for lethal closed retroperitoneal pelvic hemorrhage in a swine model: a comparable and minimally invasive alternative to open pre-peritoneal pelvic packing. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 81(6): 1046-1055

Статистика просмотров

Загрузка метрик ...

Ссылки

  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.