Agadzhanyan V.V.
Regional
Clinical Center of Miners’ Health Protection, Leninsk-Kuznetsky, Russia,
Novosibirsk Research Institute of
Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Ya.L. Tsivyan, Novosibirsk, Russia
THE ISSUE OF DEVELOPMENT OF POLYTRAUMA REGISTRY IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
At various times, the medical society had been actively discussing the
issues of development of polytrauma registry. Multiple publications testify
this fact [1-5, 9-12].
As a rule, polytrauma registries are nationwide and are used for
increasing availability and providing the high quality of medical care for
patients with severe trauma [13-17]. Two main goals are to be solved: warranty
of quality of medical care in certain medical facilities, and implementation of
high tech, evidence-based methods for arrangement, diagnostics and treatment.
In the Russian Federation, the attempts of creation of polytrauma
registries are realized in view of guidelines of different levels [6, 7, 8].
These recommendations define the main terms and notions used for
characteristics of polytrauma, such as injury severity and condition severity,
and present the most substantiated (from the perspective of evidence-based
medicine and clinical use) methods for selection of subsequence of surgical
treatment with consideration of dominating injuries. They are used by the
physician for selecting the optimal management strategy for patients with
polytrauma.
However the absence of the uniform definitions for discussion of
polytrauma issues from one side, and making the unified solution for practical
development of the polytrauma registry from other side have not resulted in
transition from recommendatory pattern to development of the Russian national
registry of polytrauma.
In our previous study [6], we offered to use the modified control list of
the measures (CLM) for trauma management according to the WHO guidelines [17].
Having the minimal set of the tools for polytrauma, one can continue the
detailed discussion of subsequent practical construction of polytrauma registries.
The main tasks:
1. The control of the whole chain of medical care to identify the weaknesses
and advantages from the perspective of physicians and patients in certain
medical facilities.
2. Development of the standards of medical care realization for patients
with severe injuries at different stages.
3. Determination of criteria for estimating the efficiency and quality of
treatment and rehabilitation.
4. Provision of clinical studies for the issues of epidemiology of severe
injury, diagnosis, treatment, economics, life quality, prognosis, estimation,
recommendations, assessment of resources in medical and preventive facilities
and qualification of medical staff.
We have made another attempt to attract attention of the specialists in
polytrauma problem and necessity of development of the polytrauma registry.
Therefore, in this article, we have published the control list of the measures
(CLM) for trauma management with the WHO guidelines [6, 17], which has been
accepted as the alternative way for treating the difficult cases in the clinics
of Canada [13] and European Union [11, 14-16] for improving the management
quality and the patient’s safety (the table).
Table. Modified CLM (control list of measures) for trauma management according to WHO recommendations
Перед тем как покинуть Отделение неотложной помощи |
Before leaving the emergency department |
1. Если верхние дыхательные пути вне опасности, планируете ли вы проводить дальнейшее вмешательство на них? |
1. If upper airways are in safe, do you plan to conduct further intervention for airways? |
□ Да □ Нет, и планирую обсудить это с коллегами |
□ Yes □ No, and I have plans for discussion with my colleagues |
2. У пациента 8 или менее баллов по Шкале Комы Глазго? |
2. Is Glasgow Coma Scale 8 points or less? |
□ Нет □ Да, и пациент интубирован |
□ No □ Yes, the patient is intubated |
3. Была ли сделана рентгенография грудной клетки, и исключен ли гемо/пневмоторакс? |
3. Did somebody perform chest X-ray and exclude hemo/pneumothorax? |
□ Да |
□ Да Yes |
4. Проверена ли пульсовая оксиметрия и функционирование? |
4. Whether pulse oximetry and functioning were performed? |
□ Да |
□ Yes |
5. Была ли сделана рентгенография области таза, чтобы исключить патологию и рассмотреть вопрос о бандаже? |
5. Did somebody realize pelvic X-ray examination for excluding pathology and considering the issue about bandage? |
□ Да □ Нет (противопоказано при проникающей травме) |
□ Yes □ No (contraindicated in case of penetrating injury) |
6. Проведено ли назначение соответствующей инфузионной / инфузионно-трансфузионной терапии? (кристаллоидов, коллоидов, затем крови) |
6. Did somebody designate appropriate infusion/infusion-transfusion therapy (cristalloids, colloids, and blood afterwards)? |
□ Да |
□ Yes |
7. Проводился ли анализ крови на газы и кислотность? |
7. Whether blood analysis of gases and acidity was performed? |
□ Да |
□ Yes |
8. Находится ли пациент в состоянии шока (ацидоз, дефицит оснований ≤ -6 или стойкая тахикардия или гипотензия)? |
8. Is the patient in shock (acidosis, base deficit ≤ -6, persistent tachycardia or hypotension)? |
□ Нет □ Да |
□ No □ Yes |
Если да: доведено ли это до сведения хирурга? □ Нет □ Да |
If yes, is the surgeon informed?- □ No □ Yes |
Заказана ли кровь? И рассматривается ли возможность её переливания? |
– Is the blood ordered? Is the possibility for transfusion considered? |
□ No |
□ No |
□ Yes |
□ Yes |
9. Внутреннее кровотечение было обнаружено с помощью |
9. Internal bleeding was identified with |
□ клинического обследования (например, при огнестрельном ранении брюшной полости) |
□ clinical examination (for example, in case of abdominal gun shot) |
□ фокусированной абдоминальной сонограммы (при тупой травме живота) |
□ focused abdominal sonography (in blunt abdominal injury) |
□ лапороскопия и исследование лаважой жидкости из брюшной полости |
□ laparoscopy and examination of abdominal lavage |
□ КТ или этот вопрос ещё в процессе решения |
□ CT or this question is under decision making |
10. Проверили ли Вы открытые раны и контролируете ли вы внешние кровотечения, включая кожу черепа, спины и промежность? |
10. Did you check open wounds? Are you controlling external bleeding, including skin in the region of skull, back and crotch? |
□ Да |
□ Yes |
11. Проверили ли Вы нервно-сосудистый статус всех 4-х конечностей? |
11. Did you check nervous vascular status in all four extremities? |
□ Да |
□ Yes |
12. Измерена ли температура и исключена ли гипотермия (температура ниже 35 градусов)? |
12. Did somebody measure temperature and exclude hypothermia (body temperature < 35 degrees)? |
□ Да, и в случае необходимости предприняты действия |
□ Yes, and appropriate measures were initiated if it was necessary |
13. Приняты ли во внимание необходимость назначения анальгетиков, антибиотиков, других необходимых лекарственных препаратов? |
13. Did you consider the necessity of designation of analgetics, antibiotics and other required medicamental drugs? |
□ Да |
□ Yes |
14. Объявили ли доктора-консультанты свои планы? |
14. Did the consulting physicians give out their plans? |
□ Анестезиолог/реаниматолог |
□ Anesthesiologist/intensivist |
□ Общий хирург |
□ General surgeon |
□ Ортопед |
□ Orthopedist |
□ Нейрохирург |
□ Neurosurgeon |
(если они уведомлены) |
(if they were informed) |
15. Готовятся ли для транспортировки пациента необходимые препараты? |
15. Is somebody preparing appropriate drugs for transportation? |
□ наркотики |
□ narcotics |
□ гипнотики/атарактики |
□ hypnotics/ataractics |
□ релаксанты |
□ relaxants |
16. Остались ли у кого-то из бригады докторов вопросы, нерешенные до выписки из отделения травматологии? |
16. Does somebody among the physicians has the issues which have not been solved before discharge from traumatology department? |
It is necessary to note that the international expert group has defined
the main notion of polytrauma term. The criteria for objectifying have been
determined. They are simple, available for all medical facilities dealing with
severe injured patients, and can be recommended for the basis of implementation
into the scientific and practical activity of the Russian medicine.
With these criteria, the work group (associations, academies or society)
of polytrauma issues will able to develop, and to perform the practical
implementation of the national registries of polytrauma. Certainly, the
successful integration of the registry requires the procedures of coordination,
accept and acknowledgement with adherence to obligatory availability/openness,
and possibility for feedback of executors and developers etc.
For wide discussion and making the changes in the control list of the
measures for polytrauma management, we invite the health care managers, the
employees of trauma centers of all levels, the society of the
traumatologist-orthopedists, the surgeons, the neurosurgeons, the intensivists,
the anesthesiologists and other specialists.
Wide discussion of these issues should increase the efficiency of use of
the modern medical technologies that will decrease such socially important
values as working incapability, disability, mortality, and, as result, will increase
the quality and span of life of the population in the country.
The cooperation of the professionals in different medical fields will
give a strong stimulus for experience exchange and improving the medical care
arrangement system for patients with polytrauma, since the development of the
optimal approach to prevention, diagnostics and treatment of severe injuries is
the general task in the medical society.
I invite all concerned specialists for productive cooperation and
discussion in the pages of Polytrauma
journal. It will allow defining the tactics of cooperative activity, especially
when solving the complex interdisciplinary medical problems of polytrauma
management.
We hope that after completion of discussion the agreed recommendations
will be used for development of the Russian national registry of polytrauma
that is possible only with participation of the Health Ministry of the Russian
Federation.
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The study was conducted without sponsorship. The author declares the absence of any clear and potential conflicts of interests relating to publication of this article.
REFERENCES:
1. Agadzhanyan
VV, Pronskikh AA, Ustyantseva IM, Agalaryan AKh, Kravtsov SA, Krylov YuM et al.
Polytrauma. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 2003. 494 p. Russian (Агаджанян В.В., Пронских А.А., Устьянцева И.М.,
Агаларян, А.Х., Кравцов С.А., Крылов Ю.М. и др. Политравма. Новосибирск: Наука,
2003. 494 с.)
2. Agadzhanyan
VV, Ustyantseva IM, Pronskikh AA, Novokshonov AV, Agalaryan AKh. Polytrauma. Septic
complications. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 2005. 391 p. Russian (Агаджанян В.В., Устьянцева И.М., Пронских А.А., Новокшонов А.В., Агаларян А.Х. Политравма. Септические осложнения. Новосибирск: Наука,2005.
391 с.)
3. Agadzhanyan VV, Ustyantseva IM, Pronskikh AA, Kravtsov SA, Novokshonov AV, Agalaryan AKh, Milyukov AYu, Shatalin AA. Polytrauma. An acute management and transportation. Novosibirsk: Science, 2008. 320 p. Russian (Агаджанян В.В., Устьянцева И.М.,
Пронских А.А., Кравцов С.А., Новокшонов А.В., Агаларян А.Х., Милюков А.Ю., Шаталин
А.А. Политравма. Неотложная помощь и транспортировка. Новосибирск: Наука, 2008.
320 с.)
4. Agadzhanyan
VV, Agalaryan AKh, Ustyantseva IM, Galyatina EA, Dovgal DA, Kravtsov SA et al. Polytrauma.
Treatment of children. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 2014. 244 p. Russian (Агаджанян В.В., Агаларян А.Х., Устьянцева И.М., Галятина Е.А., Довгаль Д.А., Кравцов С.А. и др. Политравма.
Лечение детей. Новосибирск: Наука, 2014.
244 с.)
5. Agadzhanyan
VV. Polytrauma: problems and practical issues. Polytrauma. 2006; 1: 5-8. Russian (Агаджанян, В.В. Политравма: проблемы и
практические вопросы //Политравма. 2006. № 1. С. 5-8)
6. Agadzhanyan
VV, Kravtsov SA. Polytrauma: ways of development (terminology). Polytrauma. 2015; 2: 6-13.
Russian (Агаджанян
В.В., Кравцов С.А. Политравма, пути развития (терминология) //Политравма. 2015.
№ 2. С. 6-13)
7. Agadzhanyan
VV. Organization of medical care for multiple and associated injury
(polytrauma): the project of clinical recommendations (treatment protocol). Polytrauma. 2015; 4: 6-18.
Russian (Агаджанян В.В.
Организация медицинской помощи при множественной и сочетанной травме
(политравме): проект клинических рекомендаций (протокола лечения) //Политравма.
2015. № 4. С. 6-18.)
8. Savvin
YuN, Kudryavtsev BP. Clinical recommendations for rendering medical care for
patients with polytrauma in emergency situations. M., 2015. 66 p. Russian (Саввин Ю.Н., Кудрявцев
Б.П. Клинические рекомендации по оказанию медицинской помощи пострадавшим с
политравмой в чрезвычайных ситуациях. М., 2015. 66 с.)
9. Bosk CL, Dixson-Woods M, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ.
Reality check for checklists. Lancet.
2009; 374(9688): 444-445
10. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat
A-HS, Dellinger E.P, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and
mortality in a global population. N.
Engl. J. Med. 2009; 360(5):
491-499
11. Levy SM, Senter CE, Hawkins RB, Zhao JY, Kao LS, Lally
KP, et al. Implementing a surgical checklists: more that checking a box. Surgery. 2012; 152(3): 331-336
12. Mahajan RP. The WHO surgical checklist. Best Pract Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011;
25(2): 161-168
13. Nolan B, Zakirova R, Bridge
J, Nathens AB. Barriers to implementing the World Health Organization’s Trauma Care
Checklist: A Canadian single-center experience. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014; 77(5): 679-683
14. Pape HC, Lefering R, Butcher N, Peitzman A, Leenen L,
Marzi I, et al. The definition of polytrauma revisited: an international
consensus process and proposal of the new «Berlin definition». The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care
Surgery. 2014; 77(5): 780-786
15. Vats A, Vincent CA, Nagpal K, Davies RW, Darzi A,
Moorthy K. Practical challenges of introduction WHO surgical checklist: UK
pilot experience. Br. Med J. 2010;
340: b5433
16. WHO.
Global Burden of Disease, Available at: http
//www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/.Accessed March 25.2014
17. WHO. Trauma Care Checklist. Available at: http://www.whp.int/patientsafety/implementation/checlists/trauma/en/index.html
Accessed March 25, 2014
Статистика просмотров
Ссылки
- На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.