STATUS OF PATIENTS WITH HIGH RISK OF EMBOLIC COMPLICATIONS IN POLYTRAUMA
Shestova E.S., Vlasov S.V., Vlasova I.V., Ustyantseva I.M., Khokhlova O.I.
Regional Clinical Center of Miners’ Health Protection, Leninsk-Kuznetsky, Russia
The course of thrombotic process can be complicated by instable fixation of a clot to the vessel’s wall and can be a cause of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2-5 % of patients with polytrauma. Disordered fixation of thrombotic masses to the vessel’s wall is associated with development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and vascular endothelium dysfunction.
Objective – to identify the clinical and laboratory values relating to development of unstable thrombosis in patients with polytrauma.
Materials and methods. The analysis included 56 patients with polytrauma. 26 (46.4 %) patients demonstrated acute venous thrombosis (AVT), including 10 (38.5 %) cases with floating thrombosis in the superficial femoral vein (SFV). 30 patients did not have any thrombotic complications (the comparison group). The condition severity estimated with APACHE III was 78.1 ± 16.20. ISS was 25.2 ± 6.4. The blood loss was more than 20% of total blood volume. All patients had at least two injured regions: the head, the chest, the spine, the pelvis, the abdomen and the lower extremities.
The clinical and laboratory values were considered: gender, age, condition severity (APACHE III), total severity of condition according to ISS and AIS, blood loss, SAP, DAP, HR, time course of leukocytes and lymphocytes, glucose, lactate.
Results. The patients with AVT had the location of the dominating injury in the lower extremities (χ2 = 16.547, р = 0.001; OR = 6.35 (95 % CI 2.512-16.035)). Pelvic injuries were more often accompanied by embolia-threatening thrombosis (OR = 4.8 (95 % CI 1.194-19.303).
The patients with the event of thrombus flotation differed from the patients of other two groups according to their condition severity: APACHE III was 24.8% higher than in the comparison group (p = 0.004) and by 43.8% higher in the patients with uncomplicated thrombosis (p = 0.001). The amount of peripheral blood leukocytes was 27.3 % higher within 24 hours after the injury in this group as compared to the patients with stable thrombosis (p = 0.028) and by 21.2% higher than in the patients without thrombotic complications (p = 0.042). It combined with higher amount of leukocytes as compared to the group without thrombosis (2.2 times higher, p = 0.028). Subsequently, the decrease in the amount of lymphocytes was noted in the subgroup with floating thrombosis, whereas the comparison group demonstrated the increase.
The examination of lactate did not show any statistically significant differences between the groups in the first day of the follow-up, whereas the patients with developed thrombosis showed the significant increase in its level on the third day as compared to other two groups (1.8 times on average, p = 0.03). The higher serum level of glucose was noted simultaneously with lactate on the third day.
The results indicate the severe disorders of systemic hemodynamics, the evident disorders of tissue capillary blood flow and gas exchange in the patients with embolia-threatening thrombosis.
Conclusion. Therefore, in patients with polytrauma, the development of thrombosis is associated with location of a dominating injury in the region of the pelvis and the lower extremities. Moreover, pelvic injuries result in higher risk of floating thrombus as compared to stable one. Development of embolia-threatening thrombosis in patients with polytrauma is associated with more severe condition, is accompanied by systemic inflammatory response syndrome with leukocytosis and lymphopenia, as well as with hyperglycemia and hyperlactatemia.
Key words: polytrauma; floating thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; systemic inflammation
Deep venousthrombosis in the lower extremities develops in 40-60 % of cases of polytrauma
[1, 2]. In some cases, the course of the traumatic process can be complicated
by instable fixation of a clot to the vascular wall and by development of its
floating part, which, in some specific conditions, migrates with blood flow and
becomes the cause of development of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2-5 % of
patients [3, 4]. As compared to single injuries, the significantly higher
percentage of polytrauma-related embolic complications determines the critical
importance of the causes of the instable clot in such patients.
The flow of
nociceptive impulsation appears and gradually increases owing to traumatic
damage of tissues because of their alteration. It causes the increasing blood
loss and tissue microcirculation disorder determining the body feedback to
trauma, which is called the traumatic disease [5]. Polytrauma is characterized
by specific severity of disorders of the compensatory processes: traumatic
shock, hypocoagulation, massive blood loss, multiple organ insufficiency, fat
embolia and thromboembolic complications.
There is a
relationship between hemostasis disorders and development of systemic
inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Its trigger factor is the relationship
of leukocytes, activated platelets and injured endotheliocytes. Activation of
platelets stimulates the release of various cytokines and the tissue factor
with development of procoagulant state that is accompanied by migration of
leukocytes to the region of injured endothelium and formation of a clot.
Lymphopenia and cell immunity dysfunction can cause the disorders of the
thrombotic process course, including the clot fixation to the vessel’s wall
[6].
Besides
coagulation stimulation, SIRS suppresses the fibrinolysis and causes the
excessive production of acute phase proteins, intense leukocytosis and
activation of B- and T-lymphocytes and adrenal hyperfunction. Dysregulation of
inflammatory processes promotes the further injury to endothelial cells and
pathologic fragmentation of clots and their migration with development of PE
[7, 8].
High
incidence of thromboembolic complications in patients with polytrauma, asymptomatic
disease course, difficulties for treatment and high mortality determine the
necessity for identification of factors predisposing to development of such
complications.
The study objective – to identify the clinical and
laboratory values relating to development of unstable thrombosis in patients
with polytrauma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
56 patients with polytrauma, the age of 18-66 (the mean age of 41.1 ± 9.4; 52 men (92.9 %), 4 women (7.1 %)) were examined in the intensive care unit of Regional Clinical Center of Miners’ Health Protection within the time interval from 40 minutes to 24 hours after trauma in January-December 2016. The table 1 shows the characteristics of the patients.
Table 1. The characteristics of patients
Values |
Indicator values |
Mean age, years |
41.1 ± 9.4 |
Gender: men/women, abs. (%) |
52 (92.9) / 4 (7.1) |
Injury severity (ISS, points) |
25.2 ± 6.40 |
Condition severity at admission (APACHE III, points) |
78.1 ± 16.20 |
ICU stay, days |
10.2 ± 4.20 |
ALV duration, days |
4.1 ± 0.71 |
Blood loss, ml |
1567 ± 578.0 |
Injury location: |
|
TBI |
29 |
Chest |
29 |
Pelvis |
14 |
Abdomen |
21 |
Spine |
9 |
Extremities |
30 |
Traumatic
shock of degree 1-3 with probable blood loss of 1,000-2,700 ml (20-50 % of
circulating blood volume) was identified in all patients. The individual blood
loss was estimated by summing the external and cavitary blood loss in fractures
of bone structures.
The presence
of the factors promoting the development of embolic complications was analyzed
[9, 10]. The following clinical values were estimated: gender, age, systolic arterial
pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), heart rate (HR), severity of
the patients’ condition with APACHEIII, ISS, AIS, blood loss, time of stay in
ICU, the number of SIRS criteria, the time course of leukocytes and lymphocytes
in the peripheral blood, levels of glucose and lactate.
The main
group (n = 26) included the patients with the verified venous thrombosis. This
group was distributed into two subgroups: the subgroup A (n = 16) – the
patients with venous thrombosis without signs of instability and flotation; the
subgroup B (n = 10) – the patients with venous thrombosis in the basin of the
superficial femoral vein (SFV) who had the instable clot (according to the data
of the dynamic examinations) that required for surgical treatment for
preventing PE. The comparison group (n = 30) included the patients without deep
venous thrombosis in the lower extremities.
The veins of
the lower extremities were examined with duplex scanning (DS) at the moment of
admission and each 5 minutes with use of the ultrasonic scanner MyLab Class C
(Esaote, Italy). The linear transducer (7-14 MHz) was used for scanning the
veins from the posterior tibial veins (PTV) to the general femoral veins. The
convex transducer of 3.5 MHz was used for examining the iliac vessels and
inferior vena cava. The venous patency was estimated with the test with venous
compression using the transducer with proximal and distal compression of the
hip and leg muscles. The venous thrombosis was verified with the following
criteria: extension and loss of venous compression, visualization of pathologic
structures in the venous lumen, absence of blood flow or registration of
parietal blood flow around thrombotic masses (Fig. 1) [11, 12].
Figure 1. Occlusive thrombus in the superficial femoral
vein with signs of initiation of recanalization – insignificant mural blood
flow
Embologenic
threat was estimated if a moving top of a clot was identified. High possibility
of embolia was associated with the clots with more than 2 cm length of the
moving part, presence of spontaneous mobility in blood flow, the “spring”
effect in Valsalva test or cough tests (if possible), active mural blood flow
(circular blood flow in transverse scanning), with inhomogeneous structure of
the clot (with hypoechogenic lumen and contour defects) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Floating thrombus with high possibility of embolism – on the narrow neck, with unhomogeneous structure
However
non-stable clots were considered as embologenic owing to the feature of the
study group (need for surgical intervention, long term defence attitude,
condition severity etc.) and impossible (in most cases) tests for estimation of
mobility degree: if a moving top was not more than 2 cm, in presence of point
fixation to the venous wall and active rocking motions of the clot during vein
compression with the transducer.
The most
common location of the moving clot was the common femoral vein. Moreover, the
clot originated from the superficial femoral vein (7 cases) or, rarer, from the
entry of the deep femoral vein (2 cases). In one case, the clot located in the popliteal
vein, beginning from the posterior tibial vein (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Floating thrombus in the popliteal vein
The study of
the cellular composition of the blood was carried out with the hematological
analyzer Sysmex-XT 2000i (Japan). The lactate level in the venous blood was
estimated with the critical states analyzer Roche Omni S (Germany), serum
glucose – with the biochemical analyzer Cobas 501 c.
The
statistical analysis of the results was conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics
20.0. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for estimation of the character of
distribution of the quantitative values. If the data distribution did not
correspond to the normal distribution law, the results were presented as Me
(LQ-UQ), where Me – the median and (LQ-UQ) – interquartile range (25%-75%). The
qualitative signs were described as absolute (n) and relative values (%).
Mann-Whitney non-parametric test was used for identification of differences in
quantitative values between two groups, between three groups – with
Kruskel-Wallis test with subsequent procedure of Dunnett’s multiple comparison
test. The intergroup comparison of the categorical data was realized with
consideration of the sample size with χ2 test
or Fisher’s exact test. The differences were statistically significant if p
value was lower than 0.05. Two-tailed Pearson χ2 test
or Fisher’s exact test were used for estimating the relationships between the
qualitative signs with indication of odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence
interval (95 % CI).
The study was
approved by the ethical committee of Regional Center of Miners’ Health
Protection and corresponded to WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles
for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and the Rules for Clinical
Practice in the Russian Federation confirmed by the Order of Russian Health Ministry,
June 19, 2003, No.266.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The analysis of the clinical symptoms and the laboratory values showed the presence of two-four SIRS criteria (tachypnea, tachycardia, hyperthermia, leukocytosis) in 64.3 % of the patients with polytrauma in the first three days of observation. Significant differences between the main group and the comparison group in relation to age, condition severity, injury severity and amount of surgical interventions were not identified. At the same time, it was found that polytrauma was more often complicated by thrombosis in the patients at the age of 36-45 (OR = 2.31 (95 % CI 1.009-5.278)), and was more often in the men than in the women (OR = 1.25 (95 % CI 1.045-1.425)). Also the statistically significant differences in location of injuries were found (the table 2). So if TBI, thoracic and abdominal injuries were the main damages in the patients with absent thrombosis, then injuries to the lower extremities prevailed in the patients with thrombosis (χ2 = 16.547, p = 0.001; OR = 6.35 (95 % CI 2.512-16.035)). The pelvic injuries were commonly accompanied by embologenic thrombosis (OR = 4.8 (95 % CI 1.194-19.303)).
Table 2. Location of injuries in patients with polytrauma
Injury |
Comparison group |
Main group |
Head (face) |
17 |
12 |
Chest (ribs) |
18 |
11 |
Pelvis |
6 |
8 |
Abdomen |
12 |
9 |
Spine |
5 |
4 |
Extremities |
8 |
22 |
The further
analysis showed that the patients with floating thrombosis differed from the patients
of two groups according to severity of their condition: APACHEIII was 24.8 %
higher than in the comparison group (p = 0.004) and by 43.8 % – the patients
with the uncomplicated course of thrombosis (p = 0.001) (the table 3). It was
higher than 90 points in 75 % of the patients in the subgroup B as compared to
only 14.3 % in the subgroup A (p = 0.008; OR = 5.25 (1.369-20.131)).
Table 3. Comparative clinical characteristics in patients with polytrauma
Criteria |
Comparison group |
Main group A |
Main group В |
Condition severity according to APACHE III, points |
79 (56.0-104.0) |
59 (47.0-86.0) |
105 (85.7-113.0)*,** |
Injury severity according to ISS, points |
25 (23.0-27.0) |
13 (9.0-34.0) |
34 (18.2-35.7)** |
Injury severity according to AIS |
9 (8.0-11.0) |
5 (3.0-10.0) |
10 (5.7-11.2)** |
Shock severity |
1.0 (1.00-2.00) |
1.0 (1.00-2.00) |
2.0 (1.75-2.25)*,** |
Heart rate |
100 (100.0–115.0) |
95 (90.0–110.0) |
110 (105.5–128.7) |
Systolic AP (mm Hg) |
130.0 (115.0–145.0) |
120.0 (115.0–140.0) |
110.5 (105.25–115.0) |
Diastolic AP (mm Hg) |
80.0 (60.00–85.00) |
75.0 (60.00–80.00) |
79.5 (56.25–88.50) |
Note: * – statistically significant differences as compared to the comparison group, p < 0.05; ** – statistically significant differences between the groups, p < 0.05.
This categoryof the patients showed the presence of at least three SIRS criteria, with higher incidence of leukocytosis as compared to other groups of the patients. So, the number of leukocytes in the peripheral blood was 27.3 % higher in the patients of the subgroup B in the first day after trauma as compared to the subgroup A (p = 0.028), and 21.2 % higher than in the comparison group (p = 0.042) (the table 4). The statistically significant differences relating to this value were observed between the groups during the following observation. In the first day after trauma, the subgroup B demonstrated the leukocytosis in combination with the increasing level of lymphocytes (2.2 times higher, p = 0.028). The inverse time trends were observed later: the increasing amount of lymphocytes in the subgroup B and the increase in the comparison group.
Table 4. Time course of hematological values in patients with polytrauma
Values |
Day in ICU |
Comparison group |
Main subgroup A |
Main subgroup B |
Red blood cells |
1st |
3.5 (3.40-3.67) |
3.7 (3.26-4.37) |
3.3 (2.65-3.97) |
3rd |
3.5 (3.00-3.60) |
3.6 (3.15-4.10) |
3.1 (3.05-4.40) |
|
5th |
3.6 (3.20-3.68) |
3.4 (2.94-3.87)** |
3.8 (3.65-4.10) |
|
Platelets |
1st |
169 (129.0-183.0) |
190 (141.7-240.5) |
138 (100.2-187.0) |
3rd |
144 (140.0-152.0) |
172 (111.0-203.2) |
105 (73.0-231.2) |
|
5th |
250 (215.0-344.0) |
254 (145.5-379.2) |
280 (272.5-340.7) |
|
Leukocytes |
1st |
10.4 (10.20-12.00) |
9.6 (9.3-12.4) |
13.2 (10.58-17.15)*,** |
3rd |
10.9 (9.60-14.32) |
9.70 (8.84-13.20) |
11.5 (7.97-16.05)** |
|
5th |
9.16 (6.00-15.00) |
8.7 (6.50-10.30) |
12.8 (11.60-14.45)*,** |
|
Lymphocytes |
1st |
0.84 (0.640-1.12)* |
1.38 (0.832-4.332) |
1.83 (0.880-2.960) |
3rd |
1.77 (1.110-1.870) |
1.37 (1.182-1.492) |
1.17 (1.02-1.232)* |
|
5th |
1.87 (1.50-2.70) |
1.89 (1.050-2.337) |
1.5 (1.122-2.167) |
Note: * – statistically significant differences as compared to the comparison group, p < 0.05; ** – statistically significant differences between the groups, p < 0.05.
The
mechanisms, which cause the migration of leukocytes to the injury region and
development of immune and reparative processes there, include the adhesion
reactions between activated platelets and leukocytes. The literature shows a
relationship between reactions of hemostasis and inflammation in tissue
alteration [5, 13]. This relationship, regulated by oxygen radicals, cytokines
and growth factors, results in hypercoagulation and tissue injury. Also it can
be important for vascular wall damage, and not also for clot formation, but
also for the processes of adhesion to vascular endothelium [13, 14].
The high
adhesion of leukocytes can produce the microvascular occlusions with subsequent
tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia. Lactate is considered as a parameter
reflecting the degree of tissue hypoxia. No statistically significant
intergroup differences were found in lactate examination in the first day,
whereas the patients with developed floating thrombosis showed the significant
increase (1.8 times on average, p = 0.03) in the lactate level on the third day
as compared to other two groups. Along with lactate, the higher level of serum
glucose was found on the third day in comparison with the comparison group and
the subgroup A (by 26.8 % (p = 0.01) and 22.5 % (p = 0.01) correspondingly).
One of the causes of blood glucose increase in hypoxia is associated with
suppression of insulin activity and insufficient delivery of glucose to the
cells, resulting in worsening patients’ condition. Correction of such
non-diabetic increase in glycemia is possible only in normalizing oxygen
provision.
Table 5. Time course of biochemical values in blood of patients with polytrauma
Values |
Day in ICU |
Comparison group |
Main subgroup A |
В Main subgroup B |
Glucose (mmol/l) |
1st |
8.5 (6.40-10.20) |
6.6 (4.87-9.95) |
6.1 (5.39-7.50)* |
3rd |
5.2 (5.00-5.40) |
5.5 (5.30-5.80) |
7.1 (6.12-8.07)*,** |
|
Lactate (mmol/l) |
1st |
2.2 (0.72-4.27) |
2.0 (1.77-2.77) |
1.7 (1.50-1.90) |
3rd |
2.0 (2.0-2.40) |
2.2 (1.72-2.47) |
3.8 (2.70–5.70)*,** |
|
рН |
1st |
7.35 (7.330-7.350) |
7.33 (7.280-7.40) |
7.35 (7.150-7.385) |
3rd |
7.34 (7.330-7.350) |
7.35 (7.330-7.370) |
7.36 (7.285-7.420) |
Note: * – statistically significant differences as compared to the comparison group, p < 0.05; ** – statistically significant differences between the groups, p < 0.05.
The received
results show more severe disorders of systemic hemodynamics, evident disorders
of tissue capillary blood flow and gas exchange in the patients with
embologenic thrombosis. Such disorders present the predictor of worsening
condition that correlates with the presented values of patient’s condition
severity according to APACHEIII. Blood lactate appears in glycolysis and
presents the marker of tissue hypoxia. Hypoxia, influence of sympathomimetics
on activity of the membrane enzymes, regionary blood flow disorder and liver
dysfunction in development of multiple organ dysfunction can be a cause of
lactatemia.
Therefore,
the presented results show that severe course of the traumatic disease with
events of systemic hemodynamics and capillary flow disorders, and systemic
inflammatory response syndrome with vascular endothelial injury cause the clot
formation, as well as a possibility of fragmentation of the clot head and
increasing risk of PE.
CONCLUSION
1. In patients
with polytrauma, the development of venous thrombosis is associated with
location of a main injury in the regions of the pelvis and the lower
extremities. In pelvic injuries, the risk of floating clot is higher than
stable one (OR = 4.8 (1.194-19.303)).
2. Development
of unstable (floating) thrombosis in patients with polytrauma is associated
with more severe condition (APACHE – 101.2 ± 11.3).
3. Development
of embologenic thrombosis in patients with polytrauma was accompanied by
systemic inflammatory response syndrome with leukocytosis and lymphopenia, as
well as with hyperglycemia and hyperlactatemia.
REFERENCES:
1. Bandle J, Shackford SR, Sise CB,
Knudson MM. Variability is the standard: the management of venous thromboembolic disease
following trauma. The Journal of Trauma
and Acute Care Surgery. 2014; 76(1): 213-215
2. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: american college of chest physicians
evidence-Based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition) Chest. 2008; 133(6 Suppl): 381S-453S
3. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, Cushman M, Goldenberg N, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral
deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a
scientific statement from american heart association. Circulation. 2011; 123(16): 1788-1830
4. Raskob GE, Silverstein R, Bratzler DW, Heit JA, White RH. Surveillance for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism:
recommendations from a national workshop. Am.
J. Prev. Med. 2010; 38(4 Suppl): S502-S509
5. Agadzhanyan
VV, Ustyantseva IM, Pronskikh AA, Novokshonov AV, Agalaryan AKh. Polytrauma.
Septic complications. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 2005. 391 p. Russian (Агаджанян В.В., Устьянцева И.М., Пронских А.А., Новокшонов А.В., Агаларян А.Х. Политравма. Септические осложнения. Новосибирск: Наука, 2005. 391 с.)
6. Sorensen HT. Venous thromboembolism and the concepts of the
incidence and mortality. Journal of
Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2007; 5(4): 690-691
7. Ignatyev IM, Akchurin FR, Zanochkin AV,
Volodyukhin MYu, Bredikhin RA. Experience with treatment of floating thrombosis
in inferior vena cava system. Phlebology.
2011; 5(4): 44-51. Russian (Игнатьев И.М., Акчурин Ф.Р., Заночкин А.В., Володюхин М.Ю., Бредихин Р.А. Опыт лечения флотирующи тромбозов в системе нижней полой вены //Флебология. 2011. Т. 5, № 4. С. 44-51)
8. Filippova OI,
Koloskov VV. Risks of thrombotic complications in surgery. Herald of Surgery named after I.I. Grekov. 2017; 17(2): 119-123. Russian (Филиппова О.И., Колосков В.В. Риски
тромботических осложнений в хирургии //Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 2017.
Т. 176, № 2. С. 119-123)
9. Vlasov SV, Vlasova
IV. Risk factors of thrombotic complications in patients with polytrauma. Polytrauma. 2013; 2: 42-47. Russian (Власов С.В., Власова И.В. Факторы
риска тромботических осложнений у пациентов с политравмой //Политравма. 2013. № 2. С. 42-47)
10. Trofimova EYu, Goldina IM, Lemenev VL,
Kungurtsev EV, Mikhaylov IP. Level of acute embologenic venous thrombosis as
predictor of risk of pulmonary embolism. Ultrasonic
and Functional Diagnostics. 2008; 5: 66-75. Russian (Трофимова Е.Ю., Гольдина И.М., Леменев
В.Л., Кунгурцев Е.В., Михайлов И.П. Уровень острого эмбологенного венозного тромбоза
как прогностический критерий риска развития тромбоэмболии легочной артерии //Ультразвуковая
и функциональная диагностика. 2008. № 5. С. 66-75)
11. Vlasova IV, Vlasov SV, Tleubaeva NV.
Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in lower extremity veins in patients in the
multi-profile hospital. Polytrauma.
2006; 2: 46-49. Russian (Власова И.В., Власов С.В., Тлеубаева
Н.В. Диагностика тромбозов вен нижних конечностей у пациентов многопрофильной
больницы //Политравма. 2006. № 2. С. 46-49.
12. Shulgina LE, Kostina YuP,
Reshetnikova EA. Ultrasonic study in differential diagnostics of acute
thrombosis in lower extremity veins. Ultrasonic
and Functional Diagnostics. 2006; 5: 76-83. Russian (Шульгина Л.Э., Костина Ю.П.,
Решетникова Е.А. Ультразвуковое исследование в дифференциальной диагностике
острых тромбозов глубоких вен нижних конечностей //Ультразвуковая и
функциональная диагностика. 2006. № 5. С. 76-83)
13. Ustyantseva IM, Khokhlova OI, Petukhova OV, Zhevlakova YuA, Agadzhanyan VV. Criteria of
systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in early diagnostics of sepsis
in patients with polytrauma. Polytrauma. 2010; 1: 13-16. Russian (Устьянцева И.М., Хохлова О.И.,
Петухова О.В., Жевлакова Ю.А., Агаджанян В.В. Критерии синдрома системного
воспалительного ответа (SIRS) в ранней диагностике сепсиса у
больных с политравмой //Политравма. 2010. № 1. С. 13-16)
14. Ustyantseva IM, Khokhlova OI, Petukhova OV,
Zhevlakova YuA, Agalaryan AKh. Predictive significance of inflammation markers,
lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and lactate in development of sepsis in
patients with polytrauma. Polytrauma. 2014; 3: 15-23. Russian (Устьянцева И.М., Хохлова О.И.,
Петухова О.В., Жевлакова Ю.А., Агаларян А.Х. Прогностическая значимость
маркеров воспаления, липополисахаридсвязывающего протеина и лактата в развитии
сепсиса у пациентов с политравмой //Политравма. 2014. № 3. С. 15-23)
Статистика просмотров
Ссылки
- На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.