HYPERTHERMIA IN PATIENTS WITH CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DAMAGE
Tokmakov K.A.1,2, Gorbacheva S.М.1, Unzhakov V.V.2, Gorbachev V.I.1
1Irkutsk
State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, the branch of Russian Medical
Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Irkutsk, Russia,
2Regional
Clinical Hospital No.2, Khabarovsk, Russia
The high body temperature is a quite common symptom in critically ill patients. According to the literature data, high body temperature is observed in 26-70 % of patients in the intensive care unit [7, 11, 18, 36, 47, 55]. The rate is even higher in patients of neurocritical profile [3, 56]. So, the body temperature > 38.3 °C is noted in 72 % of patients with subarachnoidal hemorrhage after cerebral aneurysm rupture [33, 69], the body temperature > 37.5 °C – in 60 % of patients with severe traumatic brain injury [57]. The causes of high temperature can be different. Centrogenous hyperthermic response (or neurogenic fever) is one of the causes in the patients with primary traumatic brain injury (TBI) (4-37 %) [67].
Classification of hyperthermic conditions
High body temperature is a distinct
sign of hyperthermic states. From the perspective of pathophysiology,
hyperthermia is a typical form of heat exchange disorder after high temperature
influence and/or disorders of heat exchange processes in the body. It is characterized
by breakdown of heat regulation processes and the body temperature exceeding
the normal values [38]. There is not any generally accepted classification of
hyperthermia. The Russian literature describes the following hyperthermic
states: 1) body overheating (hyperthermia), 2) heat stroke, 3) sun stroke, 4)
fever, 5) various hyperthermic responses [38]. The English language literature
distributes the hyperthermic states into hyperthermia and fever (pyrexia).
Hyperthermia includes heat shock, drug-induced hyperthermia (malignant
hyperthermia [16], neuroleptic malignant syndrome [40], serotonin syndrome [9]),
endocrine hyperthermia (thyrotoxicosis, pheochromocytoma, sympathoadrenal
crisis) [66]. In such cases, the body temperature increases to 41 °C and
higher, but traditional antipyretic pharmacotherapy is usually ineffective.
Fever is classified according to two principles: infectious and non-infectious;
outhospital and intrahospital (48 hours and later after hospital admission)
[23].
Such patients are characterized by
lesser body temperature increase, and traditional pharmacotherapy is efficient
for them. Therefore, excitation of the thermoregulation center neurons and the
associated regions of the cerebral cortex and the brainstem in injuries to the
corresponding brain regions causes (according to the Russian literature) the
centrogenous hyperthermic response (one of the forms of hyperthermic
responses), as well as neurogenic fever (according to the foreign literature)
[46].
Influence of high body temperature on neurocritical patients
It has been proved that hyperthermic
states are more common for critically ill patients with acute cerebral injury
as compared to patients of the general intensive care unit [3, 56]. Also it was
suggested that fever in patients of the general intensive care unit can be a useful
response to an infection [8, 43], but aggressive decrease in temperature should
be contraindicated and can be accompanied by increasing risk of death [59]. One
of such studies showed that administration of antifever agents had increased
the mortality in septic patients, but not in non-infected patients [37]. The
controlled randomized study included 82 patients with various injuries (except
for TBI) and the body temperature ≥ 38.5 °C. The patients were distributed into
two groups: the first group received aggressive antipyretic therapy (650 mg of
acetaminophen (paracetomol) each 6 hours at the body temperature ≥ 38.5 °C and
physical cooling at the body temperature ≥ 39.5 °C); the second group received
the permissive therapy (only after reaching the body temperature ≥ 40 °C; acetaminophen
was introduced and physical cooling for achieving the body temperature < 40
°C was conducted). The study was stopped when the mortality had reached seven
cases in the group of “aggressive” therapy to one case in the group of
“permissive” therapy [62].
However there are some convincing
results that hyperthermic response increases the possibility of death in
patients with brain injury [43, 20, 60, 17, 25, 54]. It was shown that the
mortality increased in patients with TBI, stroke, if they demonstrate the high
body temperature within the first 24 hours from admission to the critical care
unit. But such feature was not found in patients with central nervous system
(CNS) infection [60]. Another study examined 390 patients with acute cerebral
perfusion disorder. The analysis was directed to the relationship between the
high body temperature and the mortality, a degree of neurologic deficiency in
survivors and cerebral lesion size. It was found that each degree of temperature
elevation caused 2.2-fold increase in the risk of unfavorable outcome
(including death). Also the hyperthermic state was associated with bigger sizes
of cerebral lesion [54]. Among 580 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
54 % of the patients had the high body temperature and showed the worst
outcomes of the disease [70]. The metaanalysis of 14,431 medical records from
the patients with acute brain injury (mainly stroke) showed a relationship
between the high body temperature and the worst outcome for each estimated
value [25]. Finally, the analysis of 7,145 medical records from the patients
with TBI (including 1,626 with severe TBI) showed that the possibility of
unfavorable outcome (and death), which was estimated with Glasgow Coma Scale,
was higher in the patients with the high body temperature within three days of
stay in the intensive care unit; moreover, duration of fever made the direct
influence on the outcome [30].
There are several possible
explanations for the fact that hyperthermic states increase the mortality in
patients with brain injury. It is known that the brain temperature is slightly
higher than the internal body temperature, but the difference increases with
increasing internal body temperature [57]. Hyperthermia increases the metabolic
requirements (temperature increase by 1° C leads to increasing metabolism by 13
%) and it is harmful for ischemic neurons [28]. The increasing brain
temperature is accompanied by the increase in the intracranial pressure [57].
Hyperthermia worsens the edema and inflammation in the injured cerebral tissues
[4]. Other possible mechanisms of brain injury are disordered integrity of hematoencephalic
barrier, disarrangement of protein structures stability and their functional
activity [25]. The estimation of metabolism in 18 patients with SAH in
hyperthermia and induced normothermia identified the decrease in lactate/ pyruvate ratio
and the lower number of cases with lactate/pyruvate > 40 (metabolic crisis)
in patients with the normal body temperature [49].
Considering the high body
temperature influence on the injured brain, it is very important to precisely
determine the etiology of the hyperthermic state and to initiate the appropriate
treatment. It is certainly that appropriate antibacterial agents are the life
saving measures in presence of indications. However the early and precise
diagnostics of centrogenous hyperthermia can prevent the unnecessary
prescription of antibiotics and concurrent complications.
Hyperthermic states in neurosurgical intensive care units
According to Badjatia N. (2009), 70 % of patients with brain injury demonstrate the
high body temperature in the intensive care unit, but in patients in the
general intensive care unit – only 30-45 %. Moreover, only a half of the cases
included fever (caused by infection) [3]. Among patients in the neurosurgical
ICU, patients with SAH demonstrated the highest risk of the hyperthermic state,
including both fever (infectious origin) and centrogenous hyperthermic response
(non-infectious origin) [12].
Other risk factors of centrogenous
hyperthermia are catheterization for cerebral ventricles and duration of stay
in ICU [13]. Among 428 patients in the neurosurgical ICU, 93 % of the patients
with length of stay > 14 days showed the high temperature. 59 % of the
patients with SAH experienced the body temperature elevation above the febrile
figures [33]. In its turn, among the patients with SAH, the highest risk of the
hyperthermic response was in the patients with high value of Hunt&Hess,
with intraventricular hemorrhage and bigger size of aneurism [20].
Fever of non-infectious origin
Infectious etiology as the cause of
fever is identified in not all patients. For patients in the neurosurgical ICU
the infectious origin is identified in only 50 % of cases with fever [3]. In
the general ICU the most common cause of non-infectious fever is so called
postsurgical fever [7]. Other possible non-infectious causes of fever are
pharmaceuticals, venous thromboembolism and non-calculous cholecystitis. Almost
each medication can cause fever, but the most common agents in the ICU are
antibiotics (especially β-lactams), anticonvulsants (phenytoin) and
barbiturates [31].
Drug therapy is an exclusion diagnosis.
There are not any specific signs. In some cases fever is accompanied by
relative bradycardia, rash and eosinophilia [39]. There is a temporary
relationship between prescription of a medical agent and development of fever
or between drug cancellation and disappearance of the high temperature. The
possible mechanisms of development are hypersensitivity responses and idiosyncratic
reactions [31]. According to PIOPED (Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary
Embolism Diagnosis), 14 % of
patients with diagnosed pulmonary embolism showed the body temperature ≥ 37.8
°C without any association with other alternative cause [64]. Venous
thromboembolism-associated fever is usually short term, with insignificant
temperature elevations. Fever disappears after initiation of anticoagulant
therapy [48]. Venous thromboembolism-associated fever is accompanied by the
increasing risk of 30-day mortality [6]. Spontaneous ischemic or inflammatory
injury to the gall bladder can happen in a critically ill patient. Gallbladder
duct occlusion, cholestasis and secondary infection can cause gangrene or
perforation of the gall bladder [29]. The diagnosis can be suspected in
patients with fever, leukocytosis and pain in the right hypochondrium. The gall
bladder ultrasonic examination is characterized by sensitivity and specificity
> 80 %. The diagnostic significance of spiral computer tomography (SCT) is
higher for the gall bladder region [32].
Centrogenous hyperthermic reaction
Even after proper examination,
etiology of fever cannot be estimated in some patients. The origin of the high
body temperature remains an enigma in 29 % of neurologic ICU patients [50, 53].
According to the data from Oliveira–Filho
J., Ezzeddine M.A. et al. (2001), among 92 examined patients with SAH, 38 patients had
the febrile temperature, including 10 (26 %) of the patients with a
non-identified infection source [50]. Among patients with TBI, 4-37 % of cases
show the centrogenous hyperthermia (after excluding other causes) [67]. The
pathogenesis of centrogenous hyperthermia has not been researched properly
[34]. Hypothalamus injury with increasing levels of PgE makes the foundation
for the origin of centrogenous hyperthermia [58]. The study involving the
rabbits identified hyperthermia and the high levels of PgE in the cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF) after administration of hemoglobin into the cerebral ventricles
[22]. It correlates with many clinical observations, when intraventricular
blood is a risk factor of development of non-infectious fever [20, 12].
Centrogenous
hyperthermic reactions demonstrate the tendency to appear in the beginning of
the treatment, confirming the fact the initial injury is centrogenous [53].
Among patients with TBI, patients with diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and damage
of the frontal lobes present the risk group of centrogenous hyperthermia [67].
Possibly, these types of TBI accompany a hypothalamus injury. A cadaveric study
showed that hypothalamus injuries were in 42.5 % of TBI cases with hyperthermia
[68]. Also it is believed that one of the causes of centrogenous hyperthermia
can be so called disbalance of neuromediators and neurohormones participating
in the thermoregulation processes (noradrenaline, serotonin, dopamine) [34].
The deficiency of dopamine causes the persistent centrogenous hyperthermia
[34]. A number of the studies were directed to identification of the predictors
of centrogenous hyperthermia. One of the predictors is time of fever appearance.
Non-infectious fever is characterized by early development at the early stages
of admission to the ICU. So, a study showed that development of hyperthermia
and SAH during 72 hours after admission are the main predictors of
non-infectious origin of fever [53]. A study of 526 patients showed that SAH and
intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) cause hyperthermia within 72 hours from the
moment of admission to the ICU, but long term fever is a predictor of
centrogenous hyperthermia [27]. Another study showed a relationship between
long tern stay in ICU, ventricular catheterization and SAH with non-infectious
origin of fever [12]. The authors of the study concluded that blood in the
ventricles was a risk factor, because ventricular catheterization often happens
in intraventricular bleeding.
Differential diagnosis
An ability to differentiate between
infectious and non-infectious causes of fever plays a crucial role for
treatment of neurologic ICU patients. A proper examination with orientation to
identification of infection source should be conducted. If the infection risk
is high or patient is unstable, then antibiotic therapy should be initiated
immediately [41]. One of the possible instruments for identification of
non-infectious origin of fever is serum biomarkers of infection. Procalcitonin
(one of such markers) was properly researched as an indicator of sepsis. The
metaanalysis was conducted in 2007 (based on 18 studies). It showed specificity
and sensitivity of the procalcitonin test > 71 % [65].
Duration of antibiotic therapy (initiated after a positive result of the
procalcitonin test) should decrease theoretically. The recent metaanalysis of
1,075 medical records (7 studies) showed that antibiotic therapy, initiated
after a positive result of the procalcitonin test, did not influence on
mortality, but reduced the duration of antibiotic therapy significantly [52].
Non-significant difference (< 0.5 °C) between basal and peripheral
temperatures (isothermy) is supported for identifying the difference between
centrogenous hyperthermia and infectious inflammatory fever [34]. Temperature
survey is conducted in the various points (axillary and rectal).
There is an interesting clinical observation that the extremely high
body temperature (> 41.1 °C) in patients in the neurosurgical ICU usually
has the non-infectious origin and can be a manifestation of centrogenous
hyperthermic response, malignant hyperthermia, malignant neuroleptic syndrome
and drug fever [14]. Besides identification of infectious origin of fever it is
also required to exclude the drug origin of hyperthermia [31]. The temperature
to heart rate ratio can be an important criterion of differential diagnosis of
hyperthermic states. Usually heart rate increases along with increasing body
temperature (with the body temperature increase by 1 °C heart rate increases
approximately by 10 contractions per minute). If the pulse rate is lower than a
predicted value for such temperature (> 38.9 °C), then relative bradycardia
takes place, except for cases when a patient receives β-blockers, verapamil, diltiazem or
when a cardiostimulator is installed.
After
consideration of
these exclusion criteria, relative bradycardia in patients with hyperthermia in
the neurosurgical ICU indicates (with high probability) the non-infectious
origin, particularly, centrogenous hyperthermic response or drug fever.
Moreover, in rare cases, relative bradycardia is noted in high temperature
patients at the background of nosocomial pneumonia and ventilator-induced
pneumonia as results of intrahospital legionellosis in general intensive care
units [15].
Drug fever encounters in approximately
10 % of patients in the ICU.
Its development does not exclude a possibility of an infectious disease or
other condition accompanied by hyperthermia. From the classical point of view,
such patients look quite well for such temperature values. Patients with drug
fever inevitably demonstrate relative bradycardia, but if the body temperature
is lower than 38.9 °C, pulse deficit can demonstrate lower obviousness. In
laboratory conditions such patients demonstrate the unexplainable leukocytosis
with leftwards shift (infectious process imitation), eosinophilia, increasing ESR,
but blood culture for sterility does not identify the signs of infectious
origin of hyperthermia. Also the levels of aminotransferase and immunoglobulin
E can increase. As a rule, such patients demonstrate the burdened allergic
anamnesis, particularly, drug anamnesis. A quite common misbelief is absence of
drug fever, when a patient consumes a medical agent for a long time, and
without any signs of allergy previously. In most cases the cause of fever is a
drug that a patient takes for a long period [14].
When the high body temperature is persistent, despite of antibiotics
administration, or microbial source is not identified, one should conduct the
screening for venous thrombosis with use of clinical and instrumental methods
(ultrasonic examination of the veins in the lower and upper extremities) [71].
Atelectasis was often mentioned as a cause of non-infectious fever, but several
studies did not identify any particularities [19]. Non-
calculous cholecystitis can be a life threatening condition after
considering the quite unclear symptoms in patients with coma [51]. Ultrasonic
abdominal examination can be efficient for diagnostics. Centrogenous
hyperthermia can be diagnosed only after appropriate exclusion of an infection
or the above mentioned non-infectious causes of fever in neurological ICUs. As
it was mentioned before, some nosologies indicate higher predisposition to
hyperthermia [12, 67, 27]. Aneurysmatic SAH is the most significant risk
factor, the second one is IVH [28]. Patients with DAI and frontal lobes damages
present the risk group among patients with TBI [67]. Ongoing fever, despite the
treatment [27] and its development within 72 hours after ICU admission [27,
53], also indicates centrogenous hyperthermia. Sometimes centrogenous
hyperthermia is not accompanied by tachycardia and sweating (usual for
infectious fever) and can be resistant to action of antipyretics [68].
Therefore, the diagnosis “centrogenous hyperthermic reaction” is a diagnosis of
exclusion [41]. Although it is desirable to prevent prescription of antibiotics
without indications owing to development of side effects, refusal from
antibacterial therapy can be fatal for septic patients.
Therapeutic possibilities
As fever is caused by prostaglandin-induced displacement of “adjustment
temperature” of hypothalamus, then appropriate therapy should block this
process. The common antipyretics (including paracetamol and non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs) prevent synthesis of prostaglandins [4]. Some studies
have shown their efficiency for management of fever [44, 26], but without
influence on mortality. Also the studies have shown that centrogenous
hyperthermic reactions more or less persistent to conventional drug therapy
[68, 61]. Only 7 % of patients with TBI and 11 % of patients with SAH showed
the decreasing body temperature after administration of antipyretics [2]. There
is not any generally accepted technique for management of centrogenous
hyperthermic reactions. Some medical agents were offered: continuous
intravenous infusion of clonidine as a part of so called neurovegetative
stabilization, [35], use of dopamine receptors agonists – bromocriptine in
combination with amantadine [34], propranolol [42], continuous infusion of low
dosages of diclofenac [13]. The physiotherapeutic treatment techniques were
offered, particularly, contact electromagnetic impact on the region between the
spinous processes C7-Th1. A study also showed that decompensated
hemicraniectomy for severe TBI promoted the cerebral temperature decrease that
was possibly by increasing conductive heat exchange [45]. A clinical study of
18 children (age from 1 week to 17 years) with severe TBI in most cases used
management of hyperthermia by means of 10-15 minutes intravenous infusion of
cold saline (4 °C) with the average volume of 18 ml/kg. The authors concluded
that such technique is safe and efficient [21]. Similar studies were conducted
for adult patients with severe TBI and showed their efficiency [5]. Physical
cooling is used, when drug therapy is insufficient. Theoretically, all medical
technique of hypothermia can be divided into two categories: invasive and
non-invasive. General external cooling can cause muscle tremor that decreases
the efficiency of the technique and increases the metabolic requirements of the
body [4]. Deep sedation with muscle relaxants can be used for prevention. Some
studies offer an alternative technique with use of selective craniocerebral
hypothermia [10] and non-invasive intranasal hypothermia [1, 63], although the
results of these studies relating to patients with severe TBI are contradictory,
mainly regarding the efficiency of this technique.
The endovascular (invasive) devices were developed for rapid stimulation
of hypothermia. After comparison of efficiency and safety of the endovascular
cooling devices for external hypothermia one can note that both techniques are
similarly efficient for induction of hypothermia, and there are not any
confirmed differences in rates of side effects, mortality and unfavorable
outcomes. However external cooling shows the lower accuracy in the phase of
hypothermia support [24].
CONCLUSION
The high body temperature in critically ill patients is a common
symptom. The injured brain is very sensitive to hyperthermia. Multiple
experimental and clinical studies show the unfavorable outcomes in patients
with TBI and the high body temperature regardless of its origin. Besides fever,
a cause of increasing body temperature in patients with acute brain injury can
be so called centrogenous hyperthermia (neurologic disease in other words).
Subarachnoidal hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage and some types of
TBI are the risk factors of development of the last one. Centrogenous
hyperthermia is a diagnosis of exclusion that should be confirmed only after
proper examination with identification of infectious or non-infectious causes
of fever. Both fever and centrogenous hyperthermia should be managed in
patients with acute brain injury. Pharmacological antipyretics (efficient for
fever, and less efficient for centrogenous hyperthermia) and physical
techniques of cooling (efficient both for fever and centrogenous hyperthermia)
can be used. Considering the current absence of a uniform technique for
management of centrogenous hyperthermia, the future attempts should be oriented
to higher amount and better quality of clinical studies for identification of
an efficient and safe technique for management of centrogenous hyperthermia.
REFERENCES:
1. Abou-Chebl A, Sung G,
Barbut D, Torbey M. Local brain temperature reduction through intranasal
cooling with the RhinoChill device: preliminary safety data in brain-injured
patients. Stroke. 2011; 42(8):
2164-2169
2. Albrecht RF, Wass CT,
Lanier WL. Occurrence of potentially detrimental temperature alterations in
hospitalized patients at risk for brain injury. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1998; 73(7): 629-635
3. Badjatia N. Fever control
in the neuro-ICU: why, who and when? Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2009; 15(2): 79-82
4. Badjatia N. Hyperthermia
and fever control in brain injury. Critical
Care Medicine. 2009; 37(7): 250-257
5. Badjatia N, Bodock M,
Guanci M, Rordorf GA. Rapid infusion of cold saline (4 degrees C) as adjunctive
treatment of fever in patients with brain injury. Neurology. 2006; 66 (11): 1739-1741
6. Barba R, Micco PD,
Blanco-Molina A, Delgado C, Cisneros E, Villalta J, et al. Fever and deep
venous thrombosis. Findings from the RIETE registry. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis. 2011; 32(3): 288-292
7. Barie PS, Hydo LJ,
Eachempati SR. Causes and consequences of fever complicating critical surgical
illness. Surgical Infections. 2004;
5(2): 145-159
8. Bernheim HA, Block LH,
Atkins E. Fever: pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and purpose. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1979;
91(2): 261-270
9. Boyer EW. The serotonin
syndrome. New England Journal of
Medicine. 2005; 352: 1112-1120
10. Cheboksarov DV. Microwave radiothermometry of brain during
craniocerebral hypothermia in the acute phase of stroke. Cand. med. sci.
abstracts diss. Moscow, 2015. 27 p. Russian (Чебоксаров Д.В. Радиотермометрия
головного мозга при краниоцеребральной гипотермии в остром периоде ишемического
инсульта: автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М., 2015. 27 с.)
11. Circiumaru B, Baldock G,
Cohen J. A prospective study of fever in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine. 1999; 25(7):
668-673
12. Commichau C, Scarmeas N,
Mayer S. Risk factors for fever in the neurologic intensive care unit. Neurology. 2003; 60(5): 837-841
13. Cormio M, Citerio G. Continuous
low dose diclofenac sodium infusion to control fever in neurosurgical critical
care. Neurocritical Care. 2007; 6(2):
82-89
14. Cunha BA.
Clinical approach to fever in the neurosurgical intensive care unit: Focus on
drug fever. Surgical Neurology International.
2013; 4(5): 318-322
15. Cunha BA. The
diagnostic significance of relative bradycardia in infectious disease. Clinical Microbiology and infection.
2000; 6(12): 633-634
16. Denborough M.
Malignant hyperthermia. Lancet. 1998;
352(9134): 1131-1136
17. Diringer MN, Reaven NL, Funk
SE, Uman GC. Elevated body temperature independently contributes to increased
length of stay in neurologic intensive care unit patients. Critical Care Medicine. 2004; 32(7): 1489-1495
18. Egi M, Morita K. Fever in
non-neurological critically ill patients: a systematic review of observational
studies. Journal Critical Care. 2012;
27(5): 428-433
19. Engoren M. Lack of
association between atelectasis and fever. Chest.
1995; 107(1): 81-84
20. Fernandez A, Schmidt JM,
Claassen J, Pavlicova M, Huddleston D, Kreiter KT, et al. Fever after
subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology.
2007; 68(13): 1013-1019
21. Fink EL, Kochanek PM, Clark
RSB, Bell MJ. Fever control and application of hypothermia using intravenous
cold saline. Pediatric Critical Care
Medicine. 2012; 13(1): 80-84
22. Frosini M, Sesti C, Valoti
M, Palmi M, Fusi F, Parente L. Rectal temperature and prostaglandin E2 increase
in cerebrospinal fluid of conscious rabbits after intracerebroventricular
injection of hemoglobin. Experimental
Brain Research. 1999; 126(2): 252-258
23. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori
TG. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. In: Olmsted RN, editor. APIC
infection control and applied epidemiology: principles and practice. St Louis:
Mosby, 1996. p. A-1 – A-20
24. Glover GW, Thomas RM,
Vamvakas G, Al-Subaie N, Cranshaw J, Walden A, et al. Intravascular versus
surface cooling for targeted temperature management after out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest - an analysis of the TTM trial data. Critical Care. 2016; 20(1): 381
25. Greer DM, Funk SE, Reaven
NL, Ouzounelli M, Uman GC. Impact of fever on outcome in patients with stroke
and neurologic injury: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Stroke. 2008; 39(11): 3029-3035
26. Haupt MT, Jastremski MS,
Clemmer TP, Metz CA, Goris GB. Effect of ibuprofen in patients with severe
sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. The Ibuprofen Study
Group. Critical Care Medicine. 1991;
19(11): 1339-1347
27. Hocker SE, Tian L, Li G,
Steckelberg GM, Mandrekar JN, Rabinstein AA. Indicators of central fever in the
neurologic intensive care unit. JAMA
Neurology. 2013; 70(12): 1499-1504
28. Holtzclaw B. The febrile
response in critical care: state of the science. Heart&Lung. 1992; 21(5): 482-501
29. Huffman JL, Schenker S. Acute
acalculous cholecystitis: a review.
Clinical Gastroenterology and
Hepatology. 2010; 8(1): 15-22
30. Jin L, Ji-yao J. Chinese
head trauma data bank: effect of hyperthermia on the outcome of acute head
trauma patients review. J. Neurotrauma.
2012; 29(1): 96-100
31. Johnson DH,
Cunha BA. Drug fever. Infectious Disease
Clinics of North America. 1996; 10(1): 85-91
32. Kiewiet JJ, Leeuwenburgh MM,
Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. A systematic review and
meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology. 2012; 264(3): 708-720
33. Kilpatrick MM, Lowry DW,
Firlik AD, Yonas H, Marion DW. Hyperthermia in the neurosurgical intensive care
unit. Neurosurgery. 2000; 47(4):
850-856
34. Kondratyev AN, Tsentsiper
LM, Kondratyeva EA, Nazarov RV, Kondratyev SA, Tokarenko AV et al. Treatment of
central hyperthermia in neurosurgical patients. Efferent therapy. 2011; 17(3):
58-59. Russian (Кондратьев А.Н., Ценципер Л.М., Кондратьева Е.А., Назаров Р.В.,
Кондратьев С.А., Токаренко А.В. и др. Лечение центральной
гипертермии у нейрореанимационных больных //Эфферентная терапия. 2011. Т. 17, №
3. С. 58-59.)
35. Kondratyev AN, Tsentsiper
LM, Kondratyeva EA, Nazarov RV. Neurovegetative stabilization as a pathogenetic
therapy for brain damage. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine. 2014; 1:
82-84. Russian (Кондратьев А.Н., Ценципер Л.М., Кондратьева
Е.А., Назаров Р.В. Нейровегетативная стабилизация как патогенетическая терапия
повреждения головного мозга //Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2014. № 1. С. 82-84.)
36. Laupland KB, Shahpori R,
Kirkpatrick AW, Ross T, Gregson DB, Stelfox HT. Occurrence and outcome of fever
in critically ill adults. Critical Care
Medical. 2008; 36(5): 1531-1535
37. Lee BH, Inui D, Suh GY, Kim
JY, Kwon JY, Par J et al. Fever and antipyretic in critically ill patients
evaluation (FACE) study group. Association of body temperature and antipyretic
treatments with mortality of critically ill patients with and without sepsis:
multi-centered prospective observational study. Critical Care. 2012; 16(1): 33
38. Litvitskiy PF. Pathophysiology: two volumes.
Vol.1. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2002. 750 p. Russian
(Литвицкий П.Ф. Патофизиология: в 2-х томах. Т. 1.
М.: ГЭОТАР-МЕД, 2002. 750 c.)
39. Mackowiak PA, LeMaistre CF. Drug fever: a
critical appraisal of conventional concepts. An analysis of 51 episodes in two
Dallas hospitals and 97 episodes reported in the English literature. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1987;
106(5): 728-733
40. B,
Aukst-Margetic B. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and its controversies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.
2010; 19 (5): 429-435
41. Meier K, Lee K. Neurogenic
Fever: Review of Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Management. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine.
2016; 32(2): 124-129
42. Meythaler JM,
Stinson AM. Fever of central origin in traumatic brain injury controlled with
propranolol. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1994; 75(7): 816-818
43. Moltz H. Fever: causes and
consequences. Neuroscience &
Biobehavioral reviews. 1993; 17(3): 237-269
44. Morris PE, Promes JT,
Guntupalli KK, Wright PE, Arons MM. A multi-center, randomized, double-blind,
parallel, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and
pharmacokinetics of intravenous ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in
critically ill and non-critically ill adults. Critical Care. 2010; 14(3): 125
45. Nakagawa K, Hills NK, Kamel
H, Morabito D, Patel PV, Manley GT, et al. The effect of decompressive
hemicraniectomy on brain temperature after severe brain injury. Neurocritical care. 2011; 15: 101-106
46. Niven DJ,
Laupland KB. Pyrexia: aetiology in the ICU. Critical
Care. 2016; 20(1): 247
47. Niven DJ, Stelfox HT,
Shahpori R, Laupland KB. Fever in adult ICUs: an interrupted time series
analysis. Critical Care Medicine.
2013; 41(8): 1863-1869
48. Nucifora G, Badano L, Hysko
F, Allocca G, Gianfagna P, Fioretti P. Pulmonary embolism and fever: when
should right-sided infective endocarditis be considered? Circulation. 2007; 115(6): 173-176
498. Oddo M, Frangos S, Milby A,
Chen I, Maloney-Wilensky E, Murtrie EM, et al. Induced normothermia attenuates
cerebral metabolic distress in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
and refractory fever. Stroke. 2009;
40(5): 1913-1916
50. Oliveira-Filho J, Ezzeddine
MA, Segal AZ, Buonanno FS, Chang Y, Ogilvy CS, et al. Fever in subarachnoid
hemorrhage: relationship to vasospasm and outcome. Neurology. 2001; 56(10): 1299-1304
51. Orlando R, Gleason E,
Drezner AD. Acute acalculous cholecystitis in the critically ill patient. The American Journal of Surgery. 1983;
145(4): 472-476
52. Prkno A, Wacker C,
Brunkhorst FM, Schlattmann P. Procalcitonin-guided therapy in intensive care
unit patients with severe sepsis and septic shock – a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2013;
17(6): 291
53. Rabinstein AA, Sandhu K.
Non-infectious fever in the neurological intensive care unit: incidence, causes
and predictors. Journal of Neurology,
Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2007; 78(11): 1278-1280
54. Reith J, Jørgensen HS,
Pedersen PM, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Jeppesen LL et al. Body temperature in
acute stroke: relation to stroke severity, infarct size, mortality and outcome.
Lancet. 1996; 347(8999): 422-425
55. Rincon F, Hunter K, Schorr
C, Dellinger RF, Zanotti-Cavazzoni S. The epidemiology of spontaneous fever and
hypothermia on admission of brain injury patients to intensive care units: a
multicenter cohort study. Journal of
Neurosurgery. 2014; 121: 950-960
56. Rincon F, Patel U, Schorr C,
Lee E, Ross S, Dellinger RF, et al. Brain injury as a risk factor for fever
upon admission to the intensive care unit and association with in-hospital case
fatality: a matched cohort study. Journal
of Intensive Care Medicine. 2015; 30(2): 107-114
57. Rossi S, Zanier ER, Mauri I,
Columbo A, Stocchetti N. Brain temperature, body core temperature, and
intracranial pressure in acute cerebral damage Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery& Psychiatry. 2001; 71(4):
448-454
58. Rudy TA, Williams JW, Yaksh
TL. Antagonism by indomethacin of neurogenic hyperthermia produced by
unilateral puncture of the anterior hypothalamic/preoptic region. The Journal of Physiology. 1977; 272(3):
721-736
59. Rumbus, Z, Matics R, Hegyi
P, Zsiboras C, Szabo I, Illes A et al. Fever is associated with reduced,
hypothermia with increased mortality in septic patients: a meta-analysis of
clinical trials. PLoS One. 2017;
12(1): e0170152
60. Saxena MK, Young P, Pilcher
D, Bailey M, Harrison D, Bellomo R, et al. Early temperature and mortality in
critically ill patients with acute neurological diseases: trauma and stroke
differ from infection. Intensive Care
Medicine. 2015; 41(5): 823-832
61. Saxena MK, Taylor C, Billot
L, Bompoint S, Gowardman J, Roberts JA, et al. The effect of paracetamol on
core body temperature in acute traumatic brain Injury: a randomised, controlled
clinical trial. PLoS One. 2015;
10(12): e0144740
62. Schulman CI, Namias N,
Doherty J, Manning RJ, Li P, Elhaddad A, et al. The effect of antipyretic
therapy upon outcomes in critically ill patients: a randomized, prospective
study. Surgical Infections. 2005;
6(4): 369-375
63. Springborg JB, Springborg
KK, Romner B. First clinical experience with intranasal cooling for
hyperthermia in brain-injured patients Neurocritical
Care. 2013; 18(3): 400-405
64. Stein PD, Afza A, Henry JW,
Villareal CG. Fever in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2000; 117(1): 39-42
65. Tang BM, Eslick GD, Craig
JC, McLean AS. Accuracy of procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically ill
patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2007; 7(3): 210-217
66. Tenner AG, Halvorson KM. Endocrine causes of
dangerous fever. Emergency Medicine
Clinics. 2013; 31: 969-986
67. Thompson HJ, Pinto-Martin J,
Bullock MR. Neurogenic fever after traumatic brain injury: an epidemiological
study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery
& Psychiatry. 2003; 74(5): 614-619
68. Thompson HJ, Tkacsa NC,
Saatman KE, Raghupathi R, McIntosh TK. Hyperthermia following traumatic brain
injury: a critical evaluation. Neurobiology
of Disease. 2003; 12(3): 163-173
69. Todd MM, Hindman BJ, Clarke
WR, Torner JC, Weeks JB, Bayman EO et al. Perioperative fever and outcome in
surgical patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(5): 897-908
70. Wartenberg KE, Schmidt JM,
Claassen J, Temes RE, Frontera JA, Ostapkovich N et al. Impact of medical
complications on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Critical Care Medicine. 2006; 34(3): 617-623
71. Weinmann EE,
Salzman EW. Deep-vein thrombosis. New
England Journal of Medicine. 1994; 331(24): 1630-1641
Статистика просмотров
Ссылки
- На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.